Here be dragons of economics, politics, and news ... traditionally non-partisan, but we've got to admit that we find one of the parties makes that rather hard to maintain in the present day
Sunday, August 12, 2012
Doing the Math on the Auto-Bailout
ABC news June, 2011 estimate of how much the auto bailout will have cost after they finish selling the shares: c. $14 billion. Low-ball estimates figure 1,000,000 jobs that would have evaporated without the bailout. Many estimates, such as that from the Center for Automotive Research, figure significantly more than a million. So at $14 billion for 1 million jobs, that's about $14,000 per job that -- thanks to the auto industry rescue -- didn't evaporate overnight.
Consider how much the unemployment and other consequences would have cost us if we hadn't prevented those job losses. Obviously there'd be unemployment checks. Also food assistance and probably medicaid. Then there'd be the lost revenue from not having those jobs to tax. Any guess as to how much we collect from auto-industry worker income taxes in a year?
Odds are pretty darn good it was a bargain, even just considering the cost over one year of all those lost jobs ... and a good many of 'em would likely have been unemployed longer than a year.
Multiply the average weekly unemployment benefit by the average duration of getting unemployment and -- even assuming that adding another million to the unemployed wouldn't up the average, you get a cost of almost $12 billion. Since at least a million workers would have lost their jobs if GM and Chrysler had collapsed, we can figure that unemployment alone would have cost at least that much.
So, that'd leave us just $2 billion to account for from the estimated cost of rescuing the auto industry. $2,000 per worker. So for the bailout to have not saved us money, the combination of what we collect from the average one of those workers in annual income tax plus what it would have cost in food/medical assistance would have had to have been less than $2,000. That seems very unlikely. It's implausible that our costs wouldn't have increased beyond what the bailout cost us if we had not implemented the bailout.
That's even before considering the economic ramifications of all those lost paychecks decimating consumer spending and demolishing what was left of the already crippled housing market.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment